Pages
(Move to ...)
Index
The Killer Arguments, Not
Current and proposed tax/welfare systems
Valuations and potential LVT receipts
Tax calculator
The transition
Personal allowances
Agriculture
Arguments
for
LVT
▼
Thursday, 17 January 2013
H. LVT would raise too much revenue
›
• The government will introduce LVT on top, without reducing existing taxes ( skip to article ) • The government will keep increasing the t...
2 comments:
I. LVT would not raise enough revenue
›
• LVT will never raise enough money to pay for all government spending ( skip to article ) • LVT will never raise enough revenue to replace...
J. There would be too much new construction
›
These arguments are tricky, because a majority of people in the UK are NIMBYs (or at least, NIMBYs are far more vocal than those who are hap...
K. There would be not enough new construction
›
Having argued that There would be too much new construction , Home-Owner-Ists are prefectly capable of changing tack completely and claiming...
24 comments:
L. LVT would make people live where they don't want to
›
• If you increase the tax on inner city/urban/suburban/rural land, that will force land owners to over-develop • If you increase the tax on...
M. LVT is anti-free market
›
• The government will effectively own all the land and thus own everything ( skip to article ) • Land use and land ownership are best left ...
N. Valuations are impossible
›
• Valuations are impossible, subjective, can’t be decided by government ( skip to article ) • The Army Of Surveyors ( skip to article ) • ...
‹
›
Home
View web version